Home / Companies / Ferguson Enterprises Inc. / 28 Nov 2023
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.: meeting of 28 Nov 2023
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
416 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ferguson Enterprises Inc. meeting of 28 Nov 2023. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 97.8% of reported votes for; 18 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,455 vote records from 169 filers. 5 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
771 vote records from 415 filers. 20 of the 407 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Frequency of the say-on-pay vote
1: 2 filers; one year: 364 filers; take no action: 25 filers; takenoaction: 8 filers; three years: 3 filers; for: 2 filers.
894 vote records from 415 filers. 3 of the 407 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
810 vote records from 169 filers. 0 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,620 vote records from 169 filers. 0 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
406 vote records from 170 filers. 4 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
810 vote records from 169 filers. 0 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Pay-vote frequency | 4. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Dimensional | For | For | Split or no vote * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| American Century | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Invesco | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Equitable | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| SEI | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Thrivent | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Voya | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| First Trust | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Principal | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| MFS | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| DWS | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Allspring | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Virtus | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ferguson Enterprises Inc. meeting?
416 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Nov 2023. On say-on-pay, 20 of 407 voted against management (4.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ferguson Enterprises Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ferguson Enterprises Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 28 Nov 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.