Home / Companies / Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. / 5 May 2026
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.: meeting of 5 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
761 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. meeting of 5 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 85.4% of reported votes for; 39 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,253 vote records from 180 filers. 26 of the 179 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 72.7% of reported votes for; 16 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
77 vote records from 39 filers. 4 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 32 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,097 vote records from 752 filers. 228 of the 726 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
416 vote records from 179 filers. 1 of the 178 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
501 vote records from 178 filers. 0 of the 177 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
15 vote records from 11 filers. 2 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
334 vote records from 147 filers. 0 of the 146 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder
Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation
297 vote records from 128 filers. 2 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 123 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
49 vote records from 27 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For * | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | Against * | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | No report | Against * | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report | Against * | For | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | Against * | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | Against * | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against * | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | Against * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | Against * | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | No report | Against * | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | Against | Against * | For | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For | For | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | Against * | For | No report |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report | Against * | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | Against * | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Against * | No report | Against * | For | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | Against * | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | No report | Against * | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | For | For |
| DWS | No report | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | No report | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Allspring | No report | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against | Against * | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | Against * | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For | For |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. meeting?
761 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 228 of 726 voted against management (31.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 5 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.