Vote Scores

Home / Companies / GEK Terna SA / 16 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 202671 filers reporting

GEK Terna SA: meeting of 16 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

71 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the GEK Terna SA meeting of 16 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

35 vote records from 17 filers. 11 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

17.6% for64.7% against17.6% other78.6% against management17 filers14.7% for85.3% against85.3% against management4,280,484 reported shares
2

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

168 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management62 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management14,169,132 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

261 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management62 filers88.4% for11.6% against11.6% against management23,325,183 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

75 vote records from 54 filers. 49 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

5.6% for92.6% against1.9% other94.2% against management54 filers11.7% for88.3% against88.3% against management5,806,860 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

253 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management62 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.0% against management21,745,750 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

36 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

75.0% for0.0% against25.0% other0.0% against management4 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management23,580 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Say-on-pay2. Auditor
VanguardNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *For
FidelityNo reportFor
DimensionalNo reportSplit or no vote
State Street and SPDRNo reportFor
American CenturyNo reportFor
InvescoNo reportFor
EquitableNo reportFor
Charles SchwabNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAANo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportFor
J.P. MorganAgainst *For
Goldman SachsNo reportFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialNo reportFor
VoyaNo reportFor
First TrustNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsNo reportFor
BNY MellonNo reportFor
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportFor
Pacific Life fundsNo reportFor
Global XNo reportFor
VirtusNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the GEK Terna SA meeting?

71 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 11 of 14 voted against management (78.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by GEK Terna SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for GEK Terna SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing GEK Terna SA with a meeting date within three days of 16 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.