Home / Companies / General Motors Company / 4 Jun 2024
General Motors Company: meeting of 4 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,329 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the General Motors Company meeting of 4 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 96.5% of reported votes for; 54 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
10,079 vote records from 341 filers. 2 of the 339 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,155 vote records from 1,298 filers. 665 of the 1,258 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 40 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
842 vote records from 339 filers. 5 of the 337 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
74 vote records from 36 filers. 7 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal to Eliminate EV Targets from Incentive Compensation Programs
745 vote records from 306 filers. 14 of the 305 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on Sustainability Risk in the Company's Supply Chain
731 vote records from 298 filers. 54 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Company's Use of Deep-Sea Mined Minerals in its Production...
733 vote records from 298 filers. 50 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Use of Child Labor in Connection with the Company's EV...
803 vote records from 322 filers. 56 of the 321 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
262 vote records from 41 filers. 5 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the General Motors Company meeting?
1,329 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 665 of 1,258 voted against management (52.9%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by General Motors Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for General Motors Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing General Motors Company with a meeting date within three days of 4 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.