Home / Companies / GOLD FIELDS LIMITED / 21 May 2026
GOLD FIELDS LIMITED: meeting of 21 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
232 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the GOLD FIELDS LIMITED meeting of 21 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,690 vote records from 107 filers. 0 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
220 vote records from 142 filers. 3 of the 137 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
224 vote records from 106 filers. 0 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
418 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,490 vote records from 106 filers. 0 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,177 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| MFS | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| DWS | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the GOLD FIELDS LIMITED meeting?
232 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 3 of 137 voted against management (2.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by GOLD FIELDS LIMITED on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for GOLD FIELDS LIMITED
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing GOLD FIELDS LIMITED with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.