Home / Companies / Itausa SA / 30 Apr 2024
Itausa SA: meeting of 30 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
71 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Itausa SA meeting of 30 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 18.2% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
88 vote records from 13 filers. 2 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.0% of reported votes for; 4 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6 vote records from 4 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
15 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
25 vote records from 10 filers. 6 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
16 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
20 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
174 vote records from 59 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 53 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
36 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Please note that votes 'in favor' and 'against' in the same agenda item are not allowed. only votes in...
109 vote records from 58 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 56 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | No report | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Fidelity | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | No report | For |
| Invesco | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Equitable | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | No report | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | No report | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | No report | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Abstain or withhold * | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | No report | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | No report | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Voya | No report | No report | No report | For |
| First Trust | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Itausa SA meeting?
71 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2024. One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Itausa SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Itausa SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Itausa SA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.