Home / Companies / JFrog Ltd. / 20 May 2024
JFrog Ltd.: meeting of 20 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the JFrog Ltd. meeting of 20 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 66.2% of reported votes for; 42 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
684 vote records from 129 filers. 38 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
83 vote records from 21 filers. 3 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
228 vote records from 129 filers. 1 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
595 vote records from 128 filers. 0 of the 123 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
12 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
75 vote records from 29 filers. 2 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For |
| American Century | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For |
| SEI | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For |
| Thrivent | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| First Trust | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For |
| Principal | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For |
| Global X | For | For |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * |
| Allspring | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For |
| Virtus | For | For |
| VanEck | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For |
| Lord Abbett | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the JFrog Ltd. meeting?
149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 18 voted against management (16.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by JFrog Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for JFrog Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing JFrog Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 20 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.