Vote Scores

Home / Companies / kakaopay Corp. / 25 Mar 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202439 filers reporting

kakaopay Corp.: meeting of 25 Mar 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

39 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the kakaopay Corp. meeting of 25 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 90.2% of reported votes for; 8 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

500 vote records from 38 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

94.7% for2.6% against2.6% other2.6% against management38 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8,106 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

58 vote records from 33 filers. 4 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

87.9% for12.1% against12.1% against management33 filers98.5% for1.5% against1.5% against management1,743,634 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

128 vote records from 38 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

86.8% for2.6% against10.5% other2.6% against management38 filers75.0% for25.0% against25.0% against management4,132,390 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

332 vote records from 38 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

97.4% for2.6% against2.6% against management38 filers64.1% for35.9% against35.9% against management10,976,097 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

12 vote records from 5 filers. 1 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

80.0% for20.0% against20.0% against management5 filers99.7% for0.3% against0.3% against management322,561 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyFor
Franklin TempletonFor
EquitableFor
Nuveen and TIAAFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertFor
J.P. MorganFor
Jackson National fundsFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
Lincoln FinancialFor
VoyaFor
BNY MellonFor
Pacific Life fundsFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the kakaopay Corp. meeting?

39 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 1 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by kakaopay Corp. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for kakaopay Corp.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing kakaopay Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 25 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.