Home / Companies / Keysight Technologies, Inc. / 21 Mar 2024
Keysight Technologies, Inc.: meeting of 21 Mar 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,062 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Keysight Technologies, Inc. meeting of 21 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 91.5% of reported votes for; 66 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,379 vote records from 298 filers. 23 of the 294 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,924 vote records from 1,036 filers. 92 of the 1,007 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
8 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
790 vote records from 296 filers. 4 of the 292 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
114 vote records from 49 filers. 3 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
118 vote records from 48 filers. 0 of the 46 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,514 vote records from 309 filers. 5 of the 305 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
697 vote records from 258 filers. 1 of the 254 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Consider, on a non-binding advisory basis, Stockholder Proposal: Simple Majority Vote
771 vote records from 290 filers. 223 of the 288 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For * |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | For | For | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | For | For | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Global X | Against * | For | For | No report |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | No report | For | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * |
| MassMutual | Against * | For | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Keysight Technologies, Inc. meeting?
1,062 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 92 of 1,007 voted against management (9.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Keysight Technologies, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Keysight Technologies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 21 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.