Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Lam Research Corporation

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXLRCX · SEC company no. 707549

Lam Research Corporation

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,683year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
6.2%99 of 1,603 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
not reportedshares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
5across 3 seasons
89.9% for5.7% against4.4% other6.2% against management1,659 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

1,683 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Lam Research Corporation for the year to 30 June 2026, across 2 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 99 of the 1,603 filers that reported a position voted against management (6.2%), close to the median company on this site (6.6%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
4 Nov 2025year to 30 June 20261,67176.2%
5 Nov 2024year to 30 June 20251,56146.0%
11 May 2024year to 30 June 2025310.0%
7 Nov 2023year to 30 June 20241,45257.2%
11 Jul 2023year to 30 June 2024920.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Lam Research CorporationMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management6.2%6.6%
Reported shares voted against managementwithheld2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 4 Nov 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyAgainst *For *
Franklin TempletonForFor *
InvescoForAgainst
EquitableForFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeAgainst *Against
PGIM and PrudentialForFor *
Jackson National fundsAgainst *Against
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForFor *
NationwideForFor *
Victory CapitalForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *
BNY MellonAgainst *For *
PrincipalForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForFor *
MFSForAgainst
TransamericaForAgainst
Federated HermesForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForFor *
Hartford FundsForFor *
DWSForFor *
PIMCOForFor *
AllspringForAgainst
MassMutualForAgainst
Harbor FundsForFor *
VirtusAgainst *For *
VanEckForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainst
Janus HendersonForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainst
American BeaconForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForFor *
Lord AbbettForAgainst
BairdForNo report
Artisan PartnersForAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,4687.2%withheld
year to 30 June 20251,5776.0%4.5%
year to 30 June 20261,6836.2%withheld

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS40,29467.8%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES11,75019.8%
AUDIT-RELATED3,6696.2%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2,3824.0%
COMPENSATION1,2862.2%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES80.0%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Lam Research Corporation?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,603 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Lam Research Corporation; 99 voted against management (6.2%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Lam Research Corporation?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 52.8% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Lam Research Corporation reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Lam Research Corporation, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.