Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Laurentian Bank of Canada / 9 Apr 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202444 filers reporting

Laurentian Bank of Canada: meeting of 9 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Laurentian Bank of Canada meeting of 9 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 97.8% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

506 vote records from 30 filers. 1 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.7% for0.0% against3.3% other3.3% against management30 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

21 vote records from 18 filers. 2 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

61.1% for11.1% against27.8% other15.4% against management18 filers82.7% for17.3% against17.3% against management924,821 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

46 vote records from 30 filers. 0 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management30 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management3,356,842 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

47 vote records from 26 filers. 0 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management26 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management3,496,300 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

8 vote records from 4 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other4 filers
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Social Dividend

45 vote records from 29 filers. 1 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

3.4% for96.6% against3.4% against management29 filers0.1% for99.9% against0.1% against management3,351,595 reported shares
7

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Commit to Filing an ESG Report Backed by "Reasonable" Assurance Engagement

45 vote records from 29 filers. 2 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

6.9% for93.1% against6.9% against management29 filers0.2% for99.8% against0.2% against management3,351,595 reported shares
8

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Disclose Non-Confidential Information Relating to the Bank's Country-by-Country Reporting

45 vote records from 29 filers. 1 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

3.4% for96.6% against3.4% against management29 filers0.1% for99.9% against0.1% against management3,351,595 reported shares
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management15,741 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal7. Proposal8. Proposal
VanguardForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstFor *Against
ThriventForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportForAgainstAgainstAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Laurentian Bank of Canada meeting?

44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 2 of 13 voted against management (15.4%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Laurentian Bank of Canada on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Laurentian Bank of Canada

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Laurentian Bank of Canada with a meeting date within three days of 9 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.