Home / Companies / LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.
LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.
How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2025
- Filers reporting
- 73year to 30 June 2025
- Against management on pay
- 54.0%34 of 63 reporting filers
- Same, by reported shares
- 47.4%shares reported on Form N-PX
- Meetings on file
- 1across 1 season
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
73 Form N-PX filers reported votes at LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. for the year to 30 June 2025, across one meeting.
On the advisory vote on executive pay, 34 of the 63 filers that reported a position voted against management (54.0%), 45.9 percentage points above the median company on this site (8.1%). By reported shares the figure is 47.4% (median 4.0%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.
Among the largest fund families, 10 voted with management on pay and 9 voted against: American Century, BNY Mellon, Northern Trust and FlexShares, T. Rowe Price, Janus Henderson, Equitable, BlackRock and iShares and Baird and others.
Meetings
| Meeting date | Season | Filers reporting | Items | Against management on pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Jul 2024 | year to 30 June 2025 | 72 | 8 | 54.0% |
Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.
Say-on-pay: this company and the median
| year to 30 June 2025 | LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. | Median company |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting filers voting against management | 54.0% | 8.1% |
| Reported shares voted against management | 47.4% | 4.0% |
Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,794 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.
How the largest families voted
Meeting of 10 Jul 2024: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.
| Family | Say-on-pay | Proposal A | Proposal B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For * | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | Against | Against | Split or no vote |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report |
| American Century | For * | Against | Split or no vote |
| Invesco | For | Split or no vote | Against |
| Equitable | For * | Against | Split or no vote |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against | Against | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Against | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For * | Against | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For * | For | Split or no vote |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | Against | Split or no vote |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For * | Against | Split or no vote |
| BNY Mellon | For * | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For * | No report | No report |
| Baird | For * | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
- Proposal A: Stockholder proposal, if properly presented, to enable stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders
- Proposal B: Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
By season
| Season | Filers reporting | Against management on pay, filers | By reported shares | Say-on-pay split |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| year to 30 June 2025 | 73 | 54.0% | 47.4% |
Category mix
Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.
| Category | Vote records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| DIRECTOR ELECTIONS | 469 | 52.2% |
| SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES | 161 | 17.9% |
| AUDIT-RELATED | 67 | 7.5% |
| SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES | 67 | 7.5% |
| CAPITAL STRUCTURE | 67 | 7.5% |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 67 | 7.5% |
Questions
How did large funds vote at LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.?
For the year to 30 June 2025, 63 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.; 34 voted against management (54.0%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.
Were there shareholder proposals at LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.?
Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2025. Across them, 6.3% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.
Is this the meeting result?
No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.
Where does the data come from?
From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,794 companies.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list LL Flooring Holdings, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.