Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Markel Group Inc. / 21 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025860 filers reporting

Markel Group Inc.: meeting of 21 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

860 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Markel Group Inc. meeting of 21 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 95.3% of reported votes for; 31 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,765 vote records from 193 filers. 3 of the 191 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.9% for1.6% against0.5% other1.6% against management193 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,235 vote records from 844 filers. 35 of the 820 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.8% for3.4% against3.8% other4.3% against management844 filers98.4% for1.5% against0.2% other1.5% against management9,178,400 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

433 vote records from 192 filers. 7 of the 190 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.4% for3.1% against0.5% other3.7% against management192 filers99.1% for0.9% against0.0% other0.8% against management3,585,129 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

45 vote records from 10 filers. 3 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

90.0% for10.0% against30.0% against management10 filers88.0% for12.0% against3.2% against management225,029 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

22 vote records from 10 filers. 1 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

90.0% for0.0% against10.0% other10.0% against management10 filers94.7% for0.0% against5.3% other6.6% against management27,760 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal for a report on the Company's greenhouse gas emissions.

414 vote records from 184 filers. 32 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

13.6% for83.7% against2.7% other17.6% against management184 filers1.9% for97.9% against0.2% other2.1% against management3,552,769 reported shares
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal for simple majority vote.

408 vote records from 179 filers. 157 of the 179 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

86.6% for12.8% against0.6% other87.7% against management179 filers77.2% for22.8% against0.0% other77.2% against management3,550,458 reported shares
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

17 vote records from 11 filers. 4 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

63.6% for36.4% against44.4% against management11 filers66.7% for33.3% against39.4% against management21,460 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal7. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstFor *
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportForAgainstFor *
FidelityForForForAgainstFor *
DimensionalForForForAgainstFor *
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstFor *
American CenturyForForForAgainstFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstFor *
InvescoForForForAgainstFor *
EquitableForForForAgainstFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *For *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainstFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstFor *
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstFor *
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstFor *
SEIForForForAgainstFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstFor *
VoyaForForForAgainstFor *
First TrustForForForAgainstFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstFor *
NationwideForForForAgainstFor *
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainstFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainstFor *
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstFor *
Global XForForForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForForAgainstFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstFor *
Hartford FundsForForForAgainstFor *
DWSNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
AllspringForForForAgainstFor *
MassMutualForForForAgainstFor *
VirtusForForForAgainstFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
American BeaconForForForForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstFor *
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Markel Group Inc. meeting?

860 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 35 of 820 voted against management (4.3%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Markel Group Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Markel Group Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Markel Group Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.