Home / Companies / Markel Group Inc. / 20 May 2026
Markel Group Inc.: meeting of 20 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
900 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Markel Group Inc. meeting of 20 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 92.4% of reported votes for; 30 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,951 vote records from 187 filers. 2 of the 186 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,333 vote records from 894 filers. 31 of the 858 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 36 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
449 vote records from 186 filers. 5 of the 185 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
111 vote records from 42 filers. 1 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
17 vote records from 11 filers. 2 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
354 vote records from 155 filers. 1 of the 154 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal for a report on the Company's strategies and action plans to mitigate material...
425 vote records from 178 filers. 47 of the 177 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to give shareholders an ability to call for a special shareholder meeting.
435 vote records from 179 filers. 85 of the 178 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
10 vote records from 6 filers. 2 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| DWS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Allspring | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Markel Group Inc. meeting?
900 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 31 of 858 voted against management (3.6%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Markel Group Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Markel Group Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Markel Group Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 20 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.