Home / Companies / Mercury Systems, Inc. / 23 Oct 2024
Mercury Systems, Inc.: meeting of 23 Oct 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
377 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mercury Systems, Inc. meeting of 23 Oct 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 90.4% of reported votes for; 31 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
713 vote records from 125 filers. 8 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
541 vote records from 373 filers. 224 of the 357 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
239 vote records from 125 filers. 1 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
31 vote records from 19 filers. 1 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
212 vote records from 109 filers. 2 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | Against * | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | No report | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | No report | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Mercury Systems, Inc. meeting?
377 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Oct 2024. On say-on-pay, 224 of 357 voted against management (62.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mercury Systems, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Mercury Systems, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mercury Systems, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 23 Oct 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.