Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Mercury Systems, Inc. / 25 Oct 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024368 filers reporting

Mercury Systems, Inc.: meeting of 25 Oct 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

368 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mercury Systems, Inc. meeting of 25 Oct 2023. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 99.2% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

785 vote records from 135 filers. 2 of the 135 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.5% for0.0% against1.5% other1.5% against management135 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

531 vote records from 355 filers. 21 of the 338 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

89.3% for5.1% against5.6% other6.2% against management355 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 317 filers; three years: 7 filers; for: 6 filers; : 5 filers; 1-year: 5 filers; 1-yr: 2 filers.

536 vote records from 358 filers. 11 of the 342 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

1.4% for0.0% against98.6% other3.2% against management358 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

261 vote records from 134 filers. 2 of the 134 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.5% for0.0% against1.5% other1.5% against management134 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.2% against management27,112,147 reported shares
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

289 vote records from 139 filers. 14 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

87.1% for8.6% against4.3% other10.1% against management139 filers87.0% for11.8% against1.2% other12.0% against management27,693,001 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

222 vote records from 109 filers. 103 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

1.8% for95.4% against2.8% other94.5% against management109 filers1.1% for98.9% against0.0% other98.8% against management23,858,258 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

45 vote records from 29 filers. 20 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

27.6% for69.0% against3.4% other69.0% against management29 filers6.4% for93.6% against0.0% other93.6% against management3,421,867 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no vote *For
VoyaForForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustForForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no voteFor
NationwideForForSplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalForForSplit or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
TransamericaForForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
AllspringNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
MassMutualNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
VirtusForForSplit or no voteFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Neuberger BermanForForSplit or no voteFor
American BeaconForForSplit or no voteFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Mercury Systems, Inc. meeting?

368 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Oct 2023. On say-on-pay, 21 of 338 voted against management (6.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mercury Systems, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Mercury Systems, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mercury Systems, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 25 Oct 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.