Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Nano Dimension Ltd. / 6 Dec 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202527 filers reporting

Nano Dimension Ltd.: meeting of 6 Dec 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

27 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Nano Dimension Ltd. meeting of 6 Dec 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 43.9% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

125 vote records from 20 filers. 2 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

15.0% for5.0% against80.0% other11.1% against management20 filers
2

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 30.6% of reported votes for; 9 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

66 vote records from 11 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

9.1% for45.5% against45.5% other0.0% against management11 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

8 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

66.7% for33.3% against0.0% against management6 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

48 vote records from 20 filers. 10 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.0% for0.0% against10.0% other55.6% against management20 filers95.6% for0.0% against4.4% other89.5% against management5,119,904 reported shares
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

84 vote records from 18 filers. 6 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

5.6% for77.8% against16.7% other35.3% against management18 filers0.5% for97.5% against2.0% other50.3% against management9,215,094 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

17 vote records from 7 filers. 1 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

85.7% for14.3% against14.3% against management7 filers60.8% for15.7% against23.5% other15.7% against management1,708,987 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

15 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

20.0% for60.0% against20.0% other0.0% against management5 filers88.7% for11.3% against0.0% against management1,988,302 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Amend Article 39 of the Company's Amended and Restated Articles of Association

33 vote records from 11 filers. 5 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

90.9% for0.0% against9.1% other50.0% against management11 filers96.2% for0.0% against3.8% other1.8% against management2,452,029 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Directors4. Auditor8. Proposal
BlackRock and iSharesSplit or no vote *No reportFor *No report
FidelitySplit or no voteAgainstForFor *
State Street and SPDRForAgainstForFor *
American CenturySplit or no voteSplit or no voteFor *For
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteSplit or no voteFor *For
Columbia ThreadneedleSplit or no voteSplit or no voteFor *For
VanEckAgainstForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Nano Dimension Ltd. meeting?

27 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Dec 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 6 voted against management (0.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Nano Dimension Ltd. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Nano Dimension Ltd.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Nano Dimension Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Dec 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.