Home / Companies / NetApp, Inc. / 10 Sep 2025
NetApp, Inc.: meeting of 10 Sep 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,024 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the NetApp, Inc. meeting of 10 Sep 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 96.6% of reported votes for; 34 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
8,036 vote records from 296 filers. 2 of the 295 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,864 vote records from 1,018 filers. 60 of the 982 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 36 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
900 vote records from 296 filers. 11 of the 295 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
114 vote records from 49 filers. 0 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,694 vote records from 298 filers. 11 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To approve a stockholder proposal regarding support for Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement.
872 vote records from 289 filers. 56 of the 288 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
4 vote records from 4 filers. 1 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | Against * | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the NetApp, Inc. meeting?
1,024 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Sep 2025. On say-on-pay, 60 of 982 voted against management (6.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by NetApp, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for NetApp, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing NetApp, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 Sep 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.