Home / Companies / Netflix, Inc. / 6 Jun 2024
Netflix, Inc.: meeting of 6 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,832 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Netflix, Inc. meeting of 6 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 92.0% of reported votes for; 182 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
11,875 vote records from 488 filers. 17 of the 485 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,604 vote records from 1,783 filers. 204 of the 1,736 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 47 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,318 vote records from 483 filers. 33 of the 480 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
87 vote records from 48 filers. 3 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal entitled, "Corporate Financial Sustainability Proposal,"
1,278 vote records from 467 filers. 21 of the 466 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal entitled, "Proposal 8 - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement,"
1,260 vote records from 465 filers. 250 of the 464 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Report on Use of Artificial Intelligence
1,262 vote records from 465 filers. 249 of the 463 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
1,258 vote records from 462 filers. 104 of the 460 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal entitled, "Amendments to the Code of Ethics and report on the board members'...
1,261 vote records from 461 filers. 46 of the 460 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
62 vote records from 16 filers. 5 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| Dimensional | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | Against * | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | For * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | Against * | Against | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Netflix, Inc. meeting?
1,832 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 204 of 1,736 voted against management (11.8%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Netflix, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Netflix, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Netflix, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.