Home / Companies / NIKE, Inc. / 10 Sep 2024
NIKE, Inc.: meeting of 10 Sep 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,773 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the NIKE, Inc. meeting of 10 Sep 2024. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 77.6% of reported votes for; 240 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,933 vote records from 415 filers. 14 of the 410 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,872 vote records from 1,742 filers. 268 of the 1,681 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 61 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
978 vote records from 410 filers. 19 of the 405 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
57 vote records from 27 filers. 1 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
To consider a shareholder proposal regarding Supplemental Pay Equity Disclosure
938 vote records from 396 filers. 174 of the 389 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
To consider a shareholder proposal regarding Worker-Driven Social Responsibility
945 vote records from 393 filers. 61 of the 387 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
To consider a shareholder proposal regarding Environmental Targets
936 vote records from 393 filers. 191 of the 387 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
To consider a shareholder proposal regarding a Divisive Partnerships Congruency Report
925 vote records from 392 filers. 24 of the 388 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
To consider a shareholder proposal regarding a Supply Chain Management Report
925 vote records from 392 filers. 79 of the 386 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
31 vote records from 8 filers. 1 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | Against * | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the NIKE, Inc. meeting?
1,773 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Sep 2024. On say-on-pay, 268 of 1,681 voted against management (15.9%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by NIKE, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for NIKE, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing NIKE, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 Sep 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.