Home / Companies / Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. / 11 Jun 2025
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.: meeting of 11 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
251 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. meeting of 11 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 65.5% of reported votes for; 38 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
388 vote records from 75 filers. 30 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
330 vote records from 247 filers. 154 of the 239 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
125 vote records from 75 filers. 3 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
6 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
247 vote records from 77 filers. 5 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
109 vote records from 68 filers. 8 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | No report | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. meeting?
251 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 154 of 239 voted against management (64.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 11 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.