Home / Companies / OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD. / 25 Jun 2025
OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD.: meeting of 25 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
20 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD. meeting of 25 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 91.9% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
211 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
6 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
24 vote records from 18 filers. 0 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
40 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
25 vote records from 3 filers. 1 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3 vote records from 3 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal: Amend Articles of Incorporation (the Establishment of a Shareholder Value...
30 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Amend Articles to Require Majority Outsider Board
29 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Approve Additional Dividend so that Dividend Equals to 8 Percent of Equity
20 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal: Approve Appropriation of Surplus
9 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| First Trust | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD. meeting?
20 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Jun 2025. 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing OSAKA STEEL CO., LTD. with a meeting date within three days of 25 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.