Home / Companies / Pharmanutra SpA / 16 Apr 2025
Pharmanutra SpA: meeting of 16 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
22 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Pharmanutra SpA meeting of 16 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
22 vote records from 9 filers. 6 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
24 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
42 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
18 vote records from 14 filers. 12 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
49 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
15 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
14 vote records from 13 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
14 vote records from 13 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
14 vote records from 13 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (C)
14 vote records from 13 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (D)
6 vote records from 4 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Fidelity | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
| Dimensional | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
| American Century | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | For | For | Against | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Pharmanutra SpA meeting?
22 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 6 of 8 voted against management (75.0%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Pharmanutra SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Pharmanutra SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Pharmanutra SpA with a meeting date within three days of 16 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.