Home / Companies / Pilgrim's Pride Corporation / 30 Apr 2025
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation: meeting of 30 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
477 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Pilgrim's Pride Corporation meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 69.8% of reported votes for; 123 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,717 vote records from 161 filers. 8 of the 159 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
753 vote records from 472 filers. 100 of the 444 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
375 vote records from 161 filers. 2 of the 159 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
381 vote records from 166 filers. 13 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | For | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Pilgrim's Pride Corporation meeting?
477 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 100 of 444 voted against management (22.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Pilgrim's Pride Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Pilgrim's Pride Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.