Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXPPC · SEC company no. 802481

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
465year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
5.5%24 of 439 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
1.6%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
4across 3 seasons
89.4% for5.0% against5.6% other5.5% against management462 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 465 funds and managers listed Pilgrim's Pride Corporation in their Form N-PX filings (one meeting).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 24 of the 439 filers that reported a position voted against management (5.5%), 1.1 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 1.6% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

All 48 of the largest fund families that reported a say-on-pay vote here voted with management.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
29 Apr 2026year to 30 June 202646355.5%
30 Apr 2025year to 30 June 2025477422.5%
23 Dec 2024year to 30 June 20251592not reported
1 May 2024year to 30 June 202437145.9%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Pilgrim's Pride CorporationMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management5.5%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management1.6%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 29 Apr 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal B
VanguardForAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainst
FidelityForFor *Against
DimensionalForAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForFor *Against
American CenturyForAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForFor *Against
InvescoForAgainstAgainst
EquitableForFor *Against
Charles SchwabForFor *Against
Nuveen and TIAAForFor *Against
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *Against
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *For *
J.P. MorganForFor *Against
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForFor *Against
PGIM and PrudentialForFor *Against
Jackson National fundsForFor *Against
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor *Against
SEIForFor *Against
T. Rowe PriceForFor *Against
ThriventForFor *Against
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainst
VoyaForAgainstAgainst
First TrustForAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForFor *Against
NationwideForFor *Against
Victory CapitalForFor *Against
Brighthouse FundsForFor *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *Against
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *Against
BNY MellonForFor *Against
PrincipalForFor *Against
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainst
Global XForFor *Against
Federated HermesForFor *Against
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportNo report
Hartford FundsForFor *Against
PIMCOForFor *Against
AllspringForFor *Against
MassMutualForNo reportNo report
VirtusForFor *Against
VanEckForFor *Against
Neuberger BermanForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo reportNo report
Cohen & SteersForFor *Against
BairdForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20243725.9%3.7%
year to 30 June 202549322.5%35.3%
year to 30 June 20264655.5%1.6%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS9,55568.1%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2,06214.7%
AUDIT-RELATED9847.0%
COMPENSATION3892.8%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE3602.6%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION3362.4%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES3362.4%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Pilgrim's Pride Corporation?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 439 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Pilgrim's Pride Corporation; 24 voted against management (5.5%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Pilgrim's Pride Corporation?

Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 3.5% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.