Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Repsol SA / 9 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024172 filers reporting

Repsol SA: meeting of 9 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

172 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Repsol SA meeting of 9 May 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

60 vote records from 33 filers. 1 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.9% for3.0% against6.1% other3.3% against management33 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management12,657,427 reported shares
2

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

322 vote records from 155 filers. 1 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.7% against management155 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.2% against management117,184,713 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,257 vote records from 155 filers. 0 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.0% against management155 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management468,359,582 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

286 vote records from 139 filers. 2 of the 138 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.8% for0.7% against1.4% other1.4% against management139 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.2% against management113,356,447 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,211 vote records from 155 filers. 1 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.7% against management155 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.2% against management460,797,639 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

320 vote records from 155 filers. 42 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

71.0% for21.3% against7.7% other27.5% against management155 filers69.9% for20.5% against9.5% other29.8% against management116,971,881 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

38 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.1% for0.0% against5.9% other0.0% against management17 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4,045,473 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

205 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for0.0% against5.3% other0.0% against management19 filers98.2% for0.8% against1.0% other0.8% against management4,681,375 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Say-on-pay2. Auditor
VanguardNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesNo reportFor
FidelityNo reportFor
DimensionalNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRNo reportFor
American CenturyNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonNo reportFor
InvescoNo reportFor
EquitableNo reportFor
Charles SchwabNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAANo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportFor
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsNo reportFor
WisdomTreeNo reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEINo reportFor
T. Rowe PriceNo reportFor
ThriventNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialNo reportFor
VoyaNo reportFor
First TrustNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsNo reportFor
NationwideNo reportFor
Victory CapitalNo reportFor
Brighthouse FundsNo reportFor
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportFor
BNY MellonNo reportFor
PrincipalNo reportFor
TransamericaNo reportFor
Federated HermesNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportFor
Hartford FundsNo reportFor
PIMCONo reportFor
AllspringNo reportFor
VirtusNo reportFor
VanEckNo reportFor
Janus HendersonNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Repsol SA meeting?

172 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 1 of 30 voted against management (3.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Repsol SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Repsol SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Repsol SA with a meeting date within three days of 9 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.