Home / Companies / RTX CORPORATION / 2 May 2024
RTX CORPORATION: meeting of 2 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,667 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RTX CORPORATION meeting of 2 May 2024. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 95.9% of reported votes for; 80 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
12,328 vote records from 387 filers. 2 of the 383 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,991 vote records from 1,624 filers. 146 of the 1,571 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 53 filers reported this item without a management mark.
5 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
944 vote records from 382 filers. 7 of the 378 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,047 vote records from 401 filers. 23 of the 397 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
55 vote records from 22 filers. 9 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCEIssuer
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
70 vote records from 21 filers. 5 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareowner Proposal Requesting a Human Rights Impact Assessment
889 vote records from 365 filers. 49 of the 363 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareowner Proposal Requesting a Report on Full Value Chain Emissions Reduction Plan
877 vote records from 366 filers. 173 of the 363 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareowner Proposal Requesting a Lobbying Transparency Report
876 vote records from 365 filers. 195 of the 363 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
53 vote records from 12 filers. 4 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Abstain or withhold * | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Abstain or withhold * | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the RTX CORPORATION meeting?
1,667 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 146 of 1,571 voted against management (9.3%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RTX CORPORATION on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for RTX CORPORATION
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RTX CORPORATION with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.