Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA / 24 Mar 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026133 filers reporting

Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA: meeting of 24 Mar 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

133 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA meeting of 24 Mar 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 56.3% of reported votes for; 46 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

195 vote records from 112 filers. 42 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

58.9% for39.3% against1.8% other38.5% against management112 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

554 vote records from 39 filers. 0 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.7% for0.0% against10.3% other0.0% against management39 filers93.1% for6.9% against7.2% against management17,307,356 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

929 vote records from 112 filers. 0 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.3% for0.0% against2.7% other0.0% against management112 filers89.8% for10.2% against10.2% against management22,050,027 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,146 vote records from 112 filers. 5 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.7% for4.5% against9.8% other4.6% against management112 filers82.1% for17.9% against17.9% against management27,904,503 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

404 vote records from 112 filers. 0 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.0% against1.8% other0.0% against management112 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management9,553,683 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

119 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

83.3% for0.0% against16.7% other0.0% against management12 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management319,473 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay
VanguardForNo report
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *For
FidelityForNo report
DimensionalAgainst *No report
State Street and SPDRForNo report
American CenturyAgainst *No report
Franklin TempletonAgainst *No report
InvescoForNo report
EquitableForNo report
Charles SchwabForNo report
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *No report
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo report
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsForNo report
WisdomTreeAgainst *No report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo report
Jackson National fundsAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo report
ThriventAgainst *No report
Lincoln FinancialForNo report
VoyaAgainst *No report
First TrustAgainstNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo report
NationwideForNo report
Brighthouse FundsAgainstNo report
BNY MellonAgainst *No report
PrincipalAgainst *No report
Pacific Life fundsForNo report
TransamericaForNo report
AllianceBernsteinForNo report
PIMCOAgainst *No report
VirtusAgainst *No report
VanEckForNo report
Lord AbbettAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA meeting?

133 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Mar 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 35 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Sartorius Stedim Biotech SA with a meeting date within three days of 24 Mar 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.