Home / Companies / SEABRIDGE GOLD INC. / 27 Jun 2024
SEABRIDGE GOLD INC.: meeting of 27 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
100 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SEABRIDGE GOLD INC. meeting of 27 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 99.6% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
507 vote records from 32 filers. 0 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
81 vote records from 75 filers. 1 of the 70 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
92 vote records from 31 filers. 1 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
86 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
35 vote records from 22 filers. 22 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
14 vote records from 10 filers. 8 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the SEABRIDGE GOLD INC. meeting?
100 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 1 of 70 voted against management (1.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SEABRIDGE GOLD INC. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for SEABRIDGE GOLD INC.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SEABRIDGE GOLD INC. with a meeting date within three days of 27 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.