Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Signify NV / 24 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 202669 filers reporting

Signify NV: meeting of 24 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

69 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Signify NV meeting of 24 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 99.7% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

330 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 60 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.0% against1.6% other0.0% against management62 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

45 vote records from 16 filers. 0 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

81.3% for0.0% against18.8% other0.0% against management16 filers97.9% for2.1% against2.1% against management16,722,737 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

493 vote records from 61 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.0% against1.6% other0.0% against management61 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management101,168,215 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

81 vote records from 52 filers. 0 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management52 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management14,864,358 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

286 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 60 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.2% for0.0% against4.8% other0.0% against management62 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.0% against management54,865,702 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

42 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for0.0% against33.3% other0.0% against management9 filers96.3% for0.0% against3.7% other0.0% against management763,321 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay
VanguardForNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForNo report
DimensionalForNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo report
American CenturyForNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo report
InvescoForNo report
Charles SchwabForNo report
Nuveen and TIAAForNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo report
Goldman SachsForNo report
WisdomTreeForNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEIForNo report
T. Rowe PriceForNo report
First TrustForNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo report
Brighthouse FundsForNo report
PrincipalForNo report
MFSForNo report
PIMCOForNo report
Artisan PartnersForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Signify NV meeting?

69 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 13 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Signify NV on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Signify NV

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Signify NV with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.