Home / Companies / SPIE SA / 3 May 2024
SPIE SA: meeting of 3 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
74 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SPIE SA meeting of 3 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
42 vote records from 20 filers. 2 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
20 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
944 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
679 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
371 vote records from 54 filers. 0 of the 54 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
173 vote records from 55 filers. 0 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report |
| SEI | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the SPIE SA meeting?
74 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 2 of 18 voted against management (11.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SPIE SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for SPIE SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SPIE SA with a meeting date within three days of 3 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.