Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Sysco Corporation / 14 Nov 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,434 filers reporting

Sysco Corporation: meeting of 14 Nov 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,434 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Sysco Corporation meeting of 14 Nov 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 48 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

9,082 vote records from 302 filers. 6 of the 302 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.0% for1.3% against0.7% other2.0% against management302 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,262 vote records from 1,425 filers. 85 of the 1,386 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 39 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.5% for5.8% against3.7% other6.1% against management1,425 filers95.6% for4.3% against0.1% other4.0% against management493,260,751 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

827 vote records from 301 filers. 12 of the 301 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.7% for4.0% against0.3% other4.0% against management301 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.3% against management182,487,393 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

33 vote records from 18 filers. 1 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.4% for0.0% against5.6% other5.9% against management18 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other1.2% against management770,644 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Adopt Mandatory Policy Separating the Roles of CEO and Board Chair

807 vote records from 289 filers. 104 of the 289 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

35.3% for64.0% against0.7% other36.0% against management289 filers21.8% for78.1% against0.0% other21.8% against management182,070,527 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

50.0% for50.0% against50.0% against management2 filers98.5% for1.5% against98.5% against management5,464 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainst
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForFor *
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForFor *
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForFor *
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForForForAgainst
PIMCOForAgainst *Against *For *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForForForFor *
VanEckForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForForForAgainst
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report
Artisan PartnersForForForAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Sysco Corporation meeting?

1,434 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 Nov 2025. On say-on-pay, 85 of 1,386 voted against management (6.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Sysco Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Sysco Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Sysco Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 14 Nov 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.