Home / Companies / Target Corporation / 11 Jun 2025
Target Corporation: meeting of 11 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,660 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Target Corporation meeting of 11 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 92.8% of reported votes for; 72 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
11,419 vote records from 368 filers. 8 of the 363 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,614 vote records from 1,639 filers. 160 of the 1,587 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 52 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
958 vote records from 364 filers. 14 of the 359 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting a report on how affirmative action initiatives impact Target's risks...
951 vote records from 352 filers. 47 of the 344 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 3 filers. 1 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against * | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Target Corporation meeting?
1,660 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 160 of 1,587 voted against management (10.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Target Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Target Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Target Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 11 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.