Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Target Corporation / 12 Jun 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 20241,680 filers reporting

Target Corporation: meeting of 12 Jun 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,680 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Target Corporation meeting of 12 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 94.7% of reported votes for; 50 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

11,953 vote records from 399 filers. 7 of the 394 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.2% for1.3% against3.5% other1.8% against management399 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,872 vote records from 1,652 filers. 155 of the 1,559 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 93 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

84.3% for9.3% against6.4% other9.9% against management1,652 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

994 vote records from 395 filers. 18 of the 391 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.9% for4.3% against1.8% other4.6% against management395 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.2% against management153,989,222 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

60 vote records from 22 filers. 3 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

72.7% for13.6% against13.6% other13.6% against management22 filers91.5% for8.5% against0.0% other8.5% against management713,539 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting a report on Target's partnerships with, charitable contributions to, and...

960 vote records from 378 filers. 20 of the 376 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.9% for95.5% against2.6% other5.3% against management378 filers0.1% for99.7% against0.2% other0.5% against management152,030,149 reported shares
6

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal to establish wage policies.

947 vote records from 379 filers. 62 of the 377 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

13.7% for83.4% against2.9% other16.4% against management379 filers3.9% for95.8% against0.2% other4.4% against management152,031,848 reported shares
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting animal pain management reporting.

898 vote records from 369 filers. 45 of the 367 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

8.9% for88.3% against2.7% other12.3% against management369 filers0.4% for99.2% against0.3% other1.1% against management140,770,725 reported shares
8

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting a political contributions congruency analysis.

945 vote records from 378 filers. 65 of the 376 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

13.8% for83.6% against2.6% other17.3% against management378 filers4.0% for95.8% against0.2% other4.4% against management152,030,543 reported shares
9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal to adopt a policy for an independent board chair.

940 vote records from 372 filers. 126 of the 369 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

32.5% for66.7% against0.8% other34.1% against management372 filers23.1% for76.9% against0.0% other23.3% against management152,007,282 reported shares
10

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

133 vote records from 23 filers. 8 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

21.7% for69.6% against8.7% other34.8% against management23 filers0.9% for99.0% against0.0% other1.1% against management11,403,404 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal6. Proposal7. Proposal8. Proposal9. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstAgainstNo reportAgainstAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
EquitableForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
SEIForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
NationwideForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst *Against *Against *Against *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForForForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
MFSForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForForAgainst *AgainstFor *For *For *For *
DWSForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
PIMCOForAgainst *Against *AgainstFor *For *For *For *
AllspringForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
American BeaconForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Target Corporation meeting?

1,680 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 155 of 1,559 voted against management (9.9%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Target Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Target Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Target Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 12 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.