Home / Companies / Texas Pacific Land Corporation / 8 Nov 2024
Texas Pacific Land Corporation: meeting of 8 Nov 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
603 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Texas Pacific Land Corporation meeting of 8 Nov 2024. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 90.4% of reported votes for; 53 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,371 vote records from 169 filers. 6 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
898 vote records from 596 filers. 51 of the 572 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
396 vote records from 169 filers. 3 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
87 vote records from 30 filers. 5 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
20 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
327 vote records from 141 filers. 1 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding an amendment to the Company's Clawback Policy.
388 vote records from 165 filers. 76 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding stockholders' ability to act by written consent.
388 vote records from 165 filers. 100 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
388 vote records from 165 filers. 45 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| DWS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Allspring | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Texas Pacific Land Corporation meeting?
603 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 Nov 2024. On say-on-pay, 51 of 572 voted against management (8.9%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Texas Pacific Land Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Texas Pacific Land Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Texas Pacific Land Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 8 Nov 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.