Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Texas Pacific Land Corporation / 10 Nov 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024518 filers reporting

Texas Pacific Land Corporation: meeting of 10 Nov 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

518 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Texas Pacific Land Corporation meeting of 10 Nov 2023. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 88.9% of reported votes for; 47 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

938 vote records from 148 filers. 6 of the 148 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.3% for2.7% against2.0% other4.1% against management148 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

753 vote records from 509 filers. 33 of the 491 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.0% for6.5% against4.5% other6.7% against management509 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

312 vote records from 147 filers. 1 of the 147 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.6% for0.0% against1.4% other0.7% against management147 filers
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

93 vote records from 15 filers. 3 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

53.3% for40.0% against6.7% other20.0% against management15 filers1.5% for98.5% against0.0% other0.9% against management1,883,379 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Adopt Share Retention Policy For Senior Executives

293 vote records from 143 filers. 62 of the 142 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

42.0% for56.6% against1.4% other43.7% against management143 filers
6

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding severance pay to senior managers as a breach of...

293 vote records from 143 filers. 15 of the 142 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

7.7% for90.9% against1.4% other10.6% against management143 filers
7

CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder

To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding adopting a policy to request that the New York...

291 vote records from 141 filers. 13 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

4.3% for93.6% against2.1% other9.2% against management141 filers
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding stockholders' ability to act by written consent.

290 vote records from 140 filers. 125 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

88.6% for10.0% against1.4% other89.9% against management140 filers
9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding stockholders' ability to call for a special...

290 vote records from 140 filers. 130 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

92.1% for6.4% against1.4% other93.5% against management140 filers
10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To consider a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding adopting a policy that requires an independent...

289 vote records from 139 filers. 27 of the 138 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

18.0% for81.3% against0.7% other19.6% against management139 filers
11

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management142 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal6. Proposal7. Proposal8. Proposal9. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
FidelityForForForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
DimensionalForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
American CenturyForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
InvescoForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
EquitableForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
WisdomTreeForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
SEIForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
VoyaAgainst *ForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
First TrustForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
NationwideForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst *Against *Against *For *For *
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *ForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
BNY MellonForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
PrincipalForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Global XForForForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Hartford FundsNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
DWSNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
PIMCONo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
MassMutualForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
VirtusForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo reportNo report
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Texas Pacific Land Corporation meeting?

518 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Nov 2023. On say-on-pay, 33 of 491 voted against management (6.7%). 6 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Texas Pacific Land Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Texas Pacific Land Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Texas Pacific Land Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 10 Nov 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.