Home / Companies / Texas Roadhouse, Inc. / 16 May 2024
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.: meeting of 16 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
635 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Texas Roadhouse, Inc. meeting of 16 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 96.6% of reported votes for; 23 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,410 vote records from 219 filers. 1 of the 218 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,085 vote records from 624 filers. 334 of the 611 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
487 vote records from 216 filers. 4 of the 215 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
57 vote records from 31 filers. 1 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
427 vote records from 189 filers. 0 of the 188 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
16 vote records from 12 filers. 2 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
966 vote records from 215 filers. 2 of the 214 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
An Advisory Vote on a Shareholder Proposal Regarding the Issuance of a Climate Report.
483 vote records from 214 filers. 83 of the 213 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | For | For * |
| Voya | For | Against * | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Principal | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| MFS | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Texas Roadhouse, Inc. meeting?
635 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 334 of 611 voted against management (54.7%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Texas Roadhouse, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Texas Roadhouse, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 16 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.