Home / Companies / The Coca-Cola Company / 29 Apr 2026
The Coca-Cola Company: meeting of 29 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
2,018 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Coca-Cola Company meeting of 29 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 93.2% of reported votes for; 163 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
15,463 vote records from 451 filers. 2 of the 448 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4,181 vote records from 1,996 filers. 125 of the 1,943 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 53 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,286 vote records from 448 filers. 17 of the 446 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
94 vote records from 25 filers. 0 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a sustainability committee by-law amendment
1,219 vote records from 433 filers. 19 of the 431 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report on risks related to ingredients
1,216 vote records from 432 filers. 51 of the 428 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report on the extent of the Company's diversity, equity and...
1,254 vote records from 431 filers. 50 of the 428 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report on the Company's plans to increase sustainability disclosure
1,213 vote records from 430 filers. 129 of the 425 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report evaluating the Company's plastics packaging policies
1,211 vote records from 429 filers. 18 of the 427 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
211 vote records from 14 filers. 2 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Cohen & Steers | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Coca-Cola Company meeting?
2,018 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 125 of 1,943 voted against management (6.4%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Coca-Cola Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Coca-Cola Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Coca-Cola Company with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.