Home / Companies / The Coca-Cola Company / 30 Apr 2025
The Coca-Cola Company: meeting of 30 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,973 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Coca-Cola Company meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 94.1% of reported votes for; 161 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
13,015 vote records from 446 filers. 3 of the 441 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,593 vote records from 1,941 filers. 124 of the 1,893 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 48 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,188 vote records from 441 filers. 15 of the 437 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
111 vote records from 31 filers. 2 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on shareowner proposal regard DEI goals in executive pay
1,139 vote records from 428 filers. 17 of the 424 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Vote on shareowner proposal regarding a report on food waste
1,131 vote records from 423 filers. 74 of the 417 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on shareowner proposal regarding creation of an improper influence board committee
1,131 vote records from 423 filers. 19 of the 419 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on shareowner proposal regarding a report on brand image impacts
1,131 vote records from 423 filers. 25 of the 418 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on shareowner proposal regarding an assessment of non-sugar sweeteners
1,132 vote records from 424 filers. 53 of the 419 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on shareowner proposal regarding a report on civil liberties in advertising services
1,118 vote records from 421 filers. 22 of the 416 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
252 vote records from 18 filers. 4 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Coca-Cola Company meeting?
1,973 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 124 of 1,893 voted against management (6.6%). 6 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Coca-Cola Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Coca-Cola Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Coca-Cola Company with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.