Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Timken Company / 3 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024631 filers reporting

The Timken Company: meeting of 3 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

631 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Timken Company meeting of 3 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 94.0% of reported votes for; 65 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,878 vote records from 217 filers. 3 of the 216 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

97.7% for0.0% against2.3% other1.4% against management217 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

985 vote records from 612 filers. 24 of the 595 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

93.0% for3.6% against3.4% other4.0% against management612 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

490 vote records from 215 filers. 7 of the 214 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

94.9% for3.3% against1.9% other3.3% against management215 filers99.6% for0.3% against0.1% other0.2% against management33,337,752 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

499 vote records from 217 filers. 17 of the 216 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

87.6% for6.9% against5.5% other7.9% against management217 filers
5

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Adopt Short and Medium-Term Science-Based Emissions Reduction Targets

462 vote records from 197 filers. 76 of the 196 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

36.5% for60.4% against3.0% other38.8% against management197 filers11.2% for88.2% against0.6% other11.6% against management32,443,273 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

17 vote records from 14 filers. 10 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for35.7% against64.3% other71.4% against management14 filers0.0% for59.6% against40.4% other46.7% against management664,872 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainst
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForAgainst *For *
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo reportNo report
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForFor *
VirtusForForForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
American BeaconForForForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Timken Company meeting?

631 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 24 of 595 voted against management (4.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Timken Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Timken Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Timken Company with a meeting date within three days of 3 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.