Home / Companies / The Timken Company / 2 May 2025
The Timken Company: meeting of 2 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
632 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Timken Company meeting of 2 May 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 93.8% of reported votes for; 61 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,261 vote records from 199 filers. 5 of the 199 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
952 vote records from 627 filers. 167 of the 602 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
429 vote records from 199 filers. 5 of the 199 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Adopt Science-Based GHG Emissions Reduction Targets Inclusive of Full Value Chain Emissions
424 vote records from 197 filers. 38 of the 197 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: COMPENSATION
418 vote records from 194 filers. 20 of the 194 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
9 vote records from 6 filers. 2 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against * | Against * |
| Voya | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Timken Company meeting?
632 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 167 of 602 voted against management (27.7%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Timken Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Timken Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Timken Company with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.