Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Timken Company

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

The Timken Company

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
699year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
24.5%162 of 661 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
24.6%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
71.1% for22.5% against6.4% other24.5% against management692 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 699 funds and managers listed The Timken Company in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 162 of the 661 filers that reported a position voted against management (24.5%), 17.9 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 24.6% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
8 May 2026year to 30 June 2026698624.5%
2 May 2025year to 30 June 2025632627.7%
3 May 2024year to 30 June 202463164.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026The Timken CompanyMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management24.5%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management24.6%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 8 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *Against
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalAgainst *Against
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForFor *
Franklin TempletonForFor *
InvescoForAgainst
EquitableForFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeAgainst *Against
PGIM and PrudentialAgainst *For *
Jackson National fundsAgainst *Against
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIAgainst *For *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForFor *
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForFor *
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *For *
NationwideAgainst *Against
Victory CapitalForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *
BNY MellonForFor *
PrincipalForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XAgainst *For *
MFSForAgainst
Federated HermesAgainst *For *
AllianceBernsteinForFor *
PIMCOForFor *
AllspringForAgainst
MassMutualForFor *
Harbor FundsForFor *
VirtusForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainst
Neuberger BermanAgainst *No report
American BeaconForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesAgainst *No report
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20246344.0%withheld
year to 30 June 202563927.7%14.0%
year to 30 June 202669924.5%24.6%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS15,50670.0%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2,99513.5%
AUDIT-RELATED1,3696.2%
COMPENSATION9444.3%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE8864.0%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4462.0%
OTHER170.1%

Questions

How did large funds vote at The Timken Company?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 661 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at The Timken Company; 162 voted against management (24.5%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at The Timken Company?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 56.6% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which The Timken Company reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list The Timken Company, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.