Home / Companies / The Travelers Companies, Inc. / 15 May 2024
The Travelers Companies, Inc.: meeting of 15 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,361 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Travelers Companies, Inc. meeting of 15 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 94.1% of reported votes for; 65 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,940 vote records from 334 filers. 7 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,269 vote records from 1,334 filers. 670 of the 1,287 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 47 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
900 vote records from 330 filers. 8 of the 326 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
135 vote records from 22 filers. 5 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Consider Pay Disparity Between CEO and Other Employees
869 vote records from 326 filers. 38 of the 324 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal relating to human rights risks in underwriting, if presented at the Annual Meeting of...
805 vote records from 308 filers. 52 of the 305 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal relating to GHG emissions, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
863 vote records from 321 filers. 57 of the 318 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal relating to a report on methane in the energy sector, if presented at the Annual...
865 vote records from 323 filers. 55 of the 320 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
115 vote records from 25 filers. 6 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Travelers Companies, Inc. meeting?
1,361 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 670 of 1,287 voted against management (52.1%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Travelers Companies, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Travelers Companies, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Travelers Companies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 15 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.