Vote Scores

Home / Companies / THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION / 4 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025338 filers reporting

THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION: meeting of 4 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

338 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION meeting of 4 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

14 nominees; 97.4% of reported votes for; 24 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,479 vote records from 107 filers. 0 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.1% for0.0% against0.9% other0.0% against management107 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

397 vote records from 264 filers. 8 of the 258 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

94.3% for3.4% against2.3% other3.1% against management264 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

178 vote records from 107 filers. 0 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management107 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management13,600,717 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

153 vote records from 74 filers. 1 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.6% for1.4% against1.4% against management74 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.1% against management17,189,880 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

113 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

14.3% for0.0% against85.7% other0.0% against management7 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management102 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Amend Artificial Intelligence (AI) Governance Framework in Alignment with the UN Guiding Principles on...

116 vote records from 69 filers. 12 of the 69 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

13.0% for84.1% against2.9% other17.4% against management69 filers0.6% for98.3% against1.1% other1.7% against management10,767,315 reported shares
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

The shareholder proposal as set out in Appendix B of the accompanying Management Proxy Circular.

49 vote records from 30 filers. 10 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

26.7% for73.3% against33.3% against management30 filers35.0% for65.0% against35.1% against management2,306,601 reported shares
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

12 vote records from 8 filers. 6 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

87.5% for12.5% against85.7% against management8 filers100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management352,231 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal7. Proposal
VanguardForNo reportForAgainstNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForForForNo reportAgainst
FidelityForNo reportForAgainstNo report
DimensionalForNo reportForAgainstNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportForAgainstNo report
American CenturyForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportForAgainstNo report
InvescoForNo reportForAgainstNo report
EquitableForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Charles SchwabForForForNo reportNo report
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportForAgainstNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForNo reportAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportForFor *No report
J.P. MorganForForForNo reportAgainst
Goldman SachsForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Jackson National fundsForForForNo reportAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *No report
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainst
VoyaForNo reportForAgainstNo report
First TrustForForForAgainstNo report
Russell InvestmentsForForForNo reportNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportForAgainst *No report
BNY MellonForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Global XForForForNo reportNo report
MFSForNo reportForAgainstNo report
TransamericaForNo reportForFor *No report
Federated HermesForForForNo reportNo report
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportForAgainstNo report
PIMCOForNo reportForAgainstNo report
MassMutualNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
VirtusForForForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION meeting?

338 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 8 of 258 voted against management (3.1%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION with a meeting date within three days of 4 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.