Vote Scores

Home / Companies / THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
345year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
7.1%17 of 241 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
not reportedshares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
4across 3 seasons
88.1% for6.7% against5.1% other7.1% against management253 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 345 funds and managers listed THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION in their Form N-PX filings (3 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 17 of the 241 filers that reported a position voted against management (7.1%), close to the median company on this site (6.6%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
10 Jun 2026year to 30 June 202632977.1%
28 Apr 2026year to 30 June 202612030.0%
4 Jun 2025year to 30 June 202533883.1%
5 Jun 2024year to 30 June 202431854.3%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATIONMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management7.1%6.6%
Reported shares voted against managementwithheld2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 10 Jun 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal B
VanguardForAgainstNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstFor *
FidelityNo reportAgainstNo report
DimensionalNo reportAgainstNo report
State Street and SPDRNo reportAgainstNo report
American CenturyNo reportAgainstNo report
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainstNo report
InvescoNo reportAgainstNo report
EquitableNo reportFor *No report
Charles SchwabForAgainstNo report
Nuveen and TIAANo reportAgainstNo report
ProShares and ProFundsNo reportAgainstNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportFor *No report
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstNo report
WisdomTreeNo reportAgainstNo report
Jackson National fundsForNo reportAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor *No report
Lincoln FinancialNo reportAgainstNo report
First TrustForAgainstNo report
Russell InvestmentsForAgainstNo report
NationwideNo reportAgainstNo report
Victory CapitalNo reportAgainstNo report
Guggenheim and RydexNo reportAgainstNo report
BNY MellonNo reportAgainstNo report
Pacific Life fundsNo reportAgainstNo report
Global XForAgainstNo report
MFSNo reportAgainstNo report
TransamericaNo reportFor *No report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainstNo report
PIMCONo reportAgainstNo report
MassMutualForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo reportNo report
BairdForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20243214.3%0.3%
year to 30 June 20253413.1%withheld
year to 30 June 20263457.1%withheld

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS7,75973.2%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES1,07410.1%
AUDIT-RELATED5695.4%
COMPENSATION4954.7%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE2051.9%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE1921.8%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES1651.6%
OTHER1221.2%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS140.1%

Questions

How did large funds vote at THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 241 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION; 17 voted against management (7.1%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION?

Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 12.8% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.