Vote Scores

Home / Companies / THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION / 10 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026329 filers reporting

THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION: meeting of 10 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

329 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION meeting of 10 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

14 nominees; 97.5% of reported votes for; 16 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,744 vote records from 106 filers. 1 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other1.0% against management106 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

410 vote records from 253 filers. 17 of the 241 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

88.1% for6.7% against5.1% other7.1% against management253 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

196 vote records from 106 filers. 1 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other1.0% against management106 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management23,755,410 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

134 vote records from 76 filers. 2 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.1% for2.6% against1.3% other2.7% against management76 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.1% against management20,794,952 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder

Human Rights Risk Assessment

163 vote records from 87 filers. 13 of the 86 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

12.6% for83.9% against3.4% other15.1% against management87 filers0.3% for99.6% against0.1% other0.4% against management22,543,200 reported shares
6

HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder

The shareholder proposal as set out in Appendix B of the accompanying Management Proxy Circular.

29 vote records from 18 filers. 7 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

38.9% for61.1% against38.9% against management18 filers7.8% for92.2% against7.8% against management1,181,155 reported shares
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management215 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal6. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstFor *
FidelityForNo reportForAgainstNo report
DimensionalForNo reportForAgainstNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportForAgainstNo report
American CenturyForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportForAgainstNo report
InvescoForNo reportForAgainstNo report
EquitableForNo reportForFor *No report
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstNo report
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportForAgainstNo report
ProShares and ProFundsForNo reportForAgainstNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportForFor *No report
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstNo report
WisdomTreeForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Jackson National fundsForForForNo reportAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *No report
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportForAgainstNo report
First TrustForForForAgainstNo report
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstNo report
NationwideForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Guggenheim and RydexForNo reportForAgainstNo report
BNY MellonForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportForAgainstNo report
Global XForForForAgainstNo report
MFSForNo reportForAgainstNo report
TransamericaForNo reportForFor *No report
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportForAgainstNo report
PIMCOForNo reportForAgainstNo report
MassMutualNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION meeting?

329 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 17 of 241 voted against management (7.1%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION with a meeting date within three days of 10 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.