Home / Companies / Union Pacific Corporation / 9 May 2024
Union Pacific Corporation: meeting of 9 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,819 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Union Pacific Corporation meeting of 9 May 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 97.3% of reported votes for; 49 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
13,336 vote records from 438 filers. 1 of the 433 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,544 vote records from 1,785 filers. 66 of the 1,725 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 60 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,109 vote records from 434 filers. 13 of the 429 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
122 vote records from 41 filers. 4 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting adoption of a policy limiting severance payments.
1,048 vote records from 418 filers. 36 of the 413 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting an amendment to the Safety and Service Quality Committee's charter to...
1,043 vote records from 413 filers. 37 of the 410 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
55 vote records from 14 filers. 5 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | Against * | For * | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Union Pacific Corporation meeting?
1,819 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 66 of 1,725 voted against management (3.8%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Union Pacific Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Union Pacific Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Union Pacific Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 9 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.