Vote Scores

Home / Companies / United Rentals, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXURI · SEC company no. 1067701

United Rentals, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,343year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
5.2%66 of 1,280 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
3.4%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
5across 3 seasons
91.6% for4.5% against3.9% other5.2% against management1,319 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,343 funds and managers listed United Rentals, Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 66 of the 1,280 filers that reported a position voted against management (5.2%), 1.4 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 3.4% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
8 May 2026year to 30 June 20261,33465.2%
5 Aug 2025year to 30 June 2025310.0%
8 May 2025year to 30 June 20251,25956.3%
5 Sep 2024year to 30 June 2024410.0%
9 May 2024year to 30 June 20241,12776.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026United Rentals, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management5.2%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management3.4%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 8 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainst
InvescoForAgainst
EquitableForAgainst
Charles SchwabForFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForFor *
NationwideForAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainst
PrincipalForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForFor *
TransamericaAbstain or withhold *Against
Federated HermesForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst
Hartford FundsForFor *
DWSForAgainst
PIMCOForAgainst
AllspringForAgainst
MassMutualForFor *
Harbor FundsForAgainst
VirtusForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainst
Janus HendersonForNo report
Neuberger BermanForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst
Lord AbbettForAgainst
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,1336.0%withheld
year to 30 June 20251,2746.3%2.2%
year to 30 June 20261,3435.2%3.4%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS26,46668.4%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES6,29616.3%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE3,2978.5%
AUDIT-RELATED2,5546.6%
COMPENSATION760.2%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES10.0%

Questions

How did large funds vote at United Rentals, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,280 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at United Rentals, Inc.; 66 voted against management (5.2%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at United Rentals, Inc.?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 21.6% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which United Rentals, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list United Rentals, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.