Home / Companies / Xylem Inc. / 13 May 2025
Xylem Inc.: meeting of 13 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,178 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Xylem Inc. meeting of 13 May 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 50 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,893 vote records from 292 filers. 6 of the 290 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,688 vote records from 1,151 filers. 80 of the 1,121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 30 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
655 vote records from 289 filers. 6 of the 287 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
77 vote records from 16 filers. 5 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
27 vote records from 15 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to lower threshold for shareholders to call special meetings from 25% to 10% of...
625 vote records from 279 filers. 142 of the 276 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Against * | Against * | For | For * |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Xylem Inc. meeting?
1,178 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 80 of 1,121 voted against management (7.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Xylem Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Xylem Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Xylem Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.