Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Yancoal Australia Ltd. / 28 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202548 filers reporting

Yancoal Australia Ltd.: meeting of 28 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

48 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Yancoal Australia Ltd. meeting of 28 May 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 73.2% of reported votes for; 31 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

244 vote records from 39 filers. 4 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

76.9% for10.3% against12.8% other10.3% against management39 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

22 vote records from 15 filers. 11 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

26.7% for66.7% against6.7% other73.3% against management15 filers29.6% for70.0% against0.4% other70.4% against management12,594,176 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

61 vote records from 39 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management39 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management18,825,158 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

190 vote records from 39 filers. 30 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

12.8% for76.9% against10.3% other76.9% against management39 filers58.8% for41.2% against41.2% against management59,473,403 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

108 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

35.3% for0.0% against64.7% other0.0% against management34 filers79.7% for20.3% against20.3% against management31,654,458 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

14 vote records from 6 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other6 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardSplit or no voteNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesNo reportAgainst *No report
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRAgainst *No reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonForNo reportFor
EquitableAgainst *No reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *No reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *No reportFor
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportFor
First TrustForNo reportFor
TransamericaForNo reportFor
Hartford FundsForNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Yancoal Australia Ltd. meeting?

48 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 11 of 15 voted against management (73.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Yancoal Australia Ltd. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Yancoal Australia Ltd.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Yancoal Australia Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 28 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.